OTEC EF 18 vs EF 32 — catalog specification comparison
Compare OTEC EF 18 and EF 32 source specifications, preserve holder and loading notes, and export a current supplier review.
Compare source fields and prepare a supplier review
Read the specification differences in context
This comparison helps a procurement or process engineer preserve two manufacturer references while preparing questions about installation, configuration and sample acceptance. The source records belong to OTEC. Jintaijin presents a reference review tool; this page does not establish an OTEC distribution relationship or an equivalent Jintaijin model. Start with the exact model labels below and check each printed condition before comparing a number.
- Container nominal volume: EF 18 18; EF 32 32.
- Container diameter: EF 18 333; EF 32 400.
- Machine width x depth x height: EF 18 620 x 780 x 1.520; EF 32 770 x 820 x 1.520.
- Machine weight: EF 18 115; EF 32 145.
A larger listed limit does not identify the better machine for a particular part. A comparison requires the current drawing, the complete holder assembly, the protected features and the planned loading route. The source uses kVA/V rather than kW, and nominal container size rather than measured batch capacity. A value marked as the same means that the source strings match; it does not prove identical process behavior, included options or allowable tooling. The filter makes these source differences easier to inspect without turning them into a suitability score.
Captured manufacturer specification table
| Source field | EF 18 | EF 32 |
|---|---|---|
| Container nominal volume Behältervolumen | 18 l | 32 l |
| Container diameter Behälterdurchmesser | 333 mm | 400 mm |
| Machine width x depth x height Maschinenmaß (B x T x H) | 620 x 780 x 1.520 mm | 770 x 820 x 1.520 mm |
| Machine weight Gewicht | 115 kg | 145 kg |
| Apparent power / supply voltage Leistungsaufnahme | 0,9/230 kVA/V | 0,9/230 kVA/V |
| Supply frequency Frequenz | 50 – 60 Hz | 50 – 60 Hz |
Source provenance and original conditions
EF 18 source context
Original reference notes: Easy Finish centrifugal-disc machine in this brochure, not EF electrofinish family. Name prefix must not merge technologies.
PDF physical page 5; captured 2026-10-05T01:11:08.462264+00:00. Source SHA256: fe6b977fa7db1b57ea5e63b77d2d10d3657e42d4f38582f6168cef45c4970300. Printed cover code02/20 is visible; revision semantics and current offer are not established.
- Easy Finish centrifugal-disc machine in this brochure, not EF electrofinish family. Name prefix must not merge technologies.
Source period punctuation in1.520 retained; dimensions BxTxH are not part envelope or installation clearance. Nominal volume not working batch weight. Source catalog reference; no part-fit approval, validated recipe, throughput, current offer, Jintaijin equivalence or OEM affiliation inference.
EF 32 source context
Original reference notes: Easy Finish centrifugal-disc machine in this brochure, not EF electrofinish family. Name prefix must not merge technologies.
PDF physical page 5; captured 2026-10-05T01:11:08.462264+00:00. Source SHA256: fe6b977fa7db1b57ea5e63b77d2d10d3657e42d4f38582f6168cef45c4970300. Printed cover code02/20 is visible; revision semantics and current offer are not established.
- Easy Finish centrifugal-disc machine in this brochure, not EF electrofinish family. Name prefix must not merge technologies.
Source period punctuation in1.520 retained; dimensions BxTxH are not part envelope or installation clearance. Nominal volume not working batch weight. Source catalog reference; no part-fit approval, validated recipe, throughput, current offer, Jintaijin equivalence or OEM affiliation inference.
Prepare the current supplier and sample review
Record the part material, geometry and protected surfaces. Describe the holder separately, including the mass and dimensions that a current manufacturer must assess. Ask whether the cited loading mode is included, optional or available on request. Keep a dimensioned insertion and movement drawing rather than assuming that a maximum diameter is a collision-free clearance. Keep the source technology separate: Easy Finish EF18/32 is a centrifugal-disc family, while EF-Vario is electrofinish. EF-Vario station counts describe original configurations rather than separate model SKUs. ECO-Maxi basic is drive-only and is excluded from these complete-execution pairs.
For a process trial, define the incoming condition and the acceptance inspection method before requesting a sample. Record the target surface, edge or protected-feature criteria as your own requirements, then obtain measured results with an identifiable sample reference. A manufacturer specification table alone does not provide a universal polishing time, media recipe, achieved roughness or output per hour. Retain unknowns until the current supplier and sample evidence resolve them.
The JSON export is generated from the controls and notes at the moment of download. Use it as a review brief alongside the current drawing and manufacturer confirmation. It does not reserve equipment, confirm a price, certify clinical use or submit an inquiry. The contact link below opens the ordinary Jintaijin inquiry page if you want to discuss a separate sample-review requirement.
Frequently asked questions
Which source fields differ between EF 18 and EF 32?
The captured source values differ for Container nominal volume, Container diameter, Machine width x depth x height, Machine weight. The table retains each printed value; differences are not performance scores.
Does this comparison approve a workpiece or holder?
No. Request a current dimensioned holder specification, part-plus-fixture mass where applicable, insertion path, motion clearance and loading confirmation. Maximum source figures do not prove safe workpiece fit.
Can these figures calculate finishing time or throughput?
No. These are equipment-reference fields. Material, media, workpiece orientation, inspection method and validated sample results are not supplied as a process dataset. No cycle-time or production-rate calculation is produced.
How are source footnotes and unknown values handled?
The original model names, printed units, asterisks and holder conditions remain attached to each record. Unstated fields and printed revision dates remain unestablished rather than receiving estimated numbers.
What is included in the downloadable review?
The current filters, matching source rows, two source references, original footnotes and your current part, fixture, supplier and acceptance notes. Changing a filter or note changes the next export. The record is a review brief, not a quotation, OEM approval or Jintaijin equivalent-product claim.
+86-592-2381506 
IPv6 network supported 