OTEC SF X/1 78 vs SF H-105 - source specification comparison

Compare OTEC SF X/1 78 and SF H-105 source specifications, preserve holder and loading notes, and export a current fixture review.

OTEC SF X/1 78 vs SF H-105 - source specification comparison - source geometry reference - Jintaijin
Original source-data reference or conceptual review flow. Keep original limits and holder basis; this graphic does not establish part fit, current supply or measured finishing results.

Compare source fields and prepare a fixture review

Read the specification differences in context

This comparison helps a procurement or process engineer preserve two manufacturer references while preparing questions about loading, fixturing and sample acceptance. The source records belong to OTEC. Jintaijin presents a reference review tool; this page does not establish an OTEC distribution relationship or an equivalent Jintaijin model. Start with the exact model labels below and check each printed condition before comparing a number.

A larger listed limit does not identify the better machine for a particular part. A comparison requires the current drawing, the complete holder assembly, the protected features and the planned loading route. A value marked as the same means that the source strings match; it does not prove identical process behavior, included options or allowable tooling. The filter makes these source differences easier to inspect without turning them into a suitability score.

Captured manufacturer specification table

Source fieldSF X/1 78SF H-105
Machine dimensions, width x depth x height
Maschinenmaß (B x T x H mm)
1930 x 1430 x 2585 mm2110 x 1620 x 2820 mm
Working container size, raw manufacturer notation
Arbeitsbehältergröße (Höhe in mm)
780 x 420 mm1050 x 500 mm
Loading mode
Beladungsart
autom. / manuell source textmanuell** source text
Connection voltage
Anschlussspannung (V)
400 V400 V
Control voltage
Steuerspannung (V)
24 V24 V
Holder interfaces / simultaneously processable workpieces
Halterschnittstellen gleichzeitig bearbeitbare Werkstücke
1-2 source count/range1-2 source count/range
Maximum diameter
Maximaler Durchmesser (mm)
150 mm300 mm
Maximum workpiece length
Max. Werkstücklänge (mm)
250 mm300 mm
Maximum workpiece weight
Max. Werkstückgewicht (kg)
2 kg60*** kg
OTEC SF X/1 78 vs SF H-105 - source specification comparison - source loading motion reference - Jintaijin
Original source-data reference or conceptual review flow. Keep original limits and holder basis; this graphic does not establish part fit, current supply or measured finishing results.

Source provenance and original conditions

SF X/1 78 source context

Source snapshot SHA-256: 10bad35ab472c38805c3c640184db7e093f92d618bd7f49cf486ac3a0b245f94. Captured UTC: 2026-10-05T00:06:44.149661+00:00.

Official manufacturer reference: OTEC PDF, page 12; captured 2026-10-05 UTC. Printed revision date is not established. PDF creation metadata is not treated as a revision or proof of current supply.

Reference specification only; not part-fit, fixture approval or guaranteed process performance. Container notation is preserved without inferring diameter, vessel volume or working capacity. No cycle time, roughness, throughput, recipe, power or Jintaijin equivalence inferred.

SF H-105 source context

Source snapshot SHA-256: 10bad35ab472c38805c3c640184db7e093f92d618bd7f49cf486ac3a0b245f94. Captured UTC: 2026-10-05T00:06:44.149661+00:00.

Official manufacturer reference: OTEC PDF, page 12; captured 2026-10-05 UTC. Printed revision date is not established. PDF creation metadata is not treated as a revision or proof of current supply.

Reference specification only; not part-fit, fixture approval or guaranteed process performance. Container notation is preserved without inferring diameter, vessel volume or working capacity. No cycle time, roughness, throughput, recipe, power or Jintaijin equivalence inferred.

Prepare the current supplier and sample review

Record the part material, geometry and protected surfaces. Describe the holder separately, including the mass and dimensions that a current manufacturer must assess. Ask whether the cited loading mode is included, optional or available on request. Keep a dimensioned insertion and movement drawing rather than assuming that a maximum diameter is a collision-free clearance. Preserve the source model group if the label contains X; do not select an invented variant from this page.

For a process trial, define the incoming condition and the acceptance inspection method before requesting a sample. Record the target surface, edge or protected-feature criteria as your own requirements, then obtain measured results with an identifiable sample reference. A manufacturer specification table alone does not provide a universal polishing time, media recipe, achieved roughness or output per hour. Retain unknowns until the current supplier and sample evidence resolve them.

The JSON export is generated from the controls and notes at the moment of download. Use it as a review brief alongside the current drawing and manufacturer confirmation. It does not reserve equipment, confirm a price, certify clinical use or submit an inquiry. The contact link below opens the ordinary Jintaijin inquiry page if you want to discuss a separate sample-review requirement.

OTEC SF X/1 78 vs SF H-105 - source specification comparison - fixture and sample review flow - Jintaijin
Original source-data reference or conceptual review flow. Keep original limits and holder basis; this graphic does not establish part fit, current supply or measured finishing results.

Frequently asked questions

Which source fields differ between SF X/1 78 and SF H-105?

The captured source values differ for Machine dimensions, width x depth x height, Working container size, raw manufacturer notation, Loading mode, Maximum diameter, Maximum workpiece length, Maximum workpiece weight. The table retains each printed value; differences are not performance scores.

Does this comparison approve a workpiece or holder?

No. Request a current dimensioned holder specification, part-plus-fixture mass where applicable, insertion path, motion clearance and loading confirmation. Maximum source figures do not prove safe workpiece fit.

Can these figures calculate finishing time or throughput?

No. These are equipment-reference fields. Material, media, workpiece orientation, inspection method and validated sample results are not supplied as a process dataset. No cycle-time or production-rate calculation is produced.

How are source footnotes and unknown values handled?

The original model names, printed units, asterisks and holder conditions remain attached to each record. Unstated fields and printed revision dates remain unestablished rather than receiving estimated numbers.

What is included in the downloadable review?

The current filters, matching source rows, two source references, original footnotes and your current part, fixture, supplier and acceptance notes. Changing a filter or note changes the next export. The record is a review brief, not a quotation, OEM approval or Jintaijin equivalent-product claim.

Related tools

Discuss your sample-review requirements

Open the Jintaijin inquiry page

#+86-592-2381506

Email : info@surface-polish.com

Headquarters address : No. 31, Xinchang Road, Xinyang Industrial Zone, Haicang District, Xiamen

click here to leave a message

Leave A Message
If you are interested in our products and want to know more details,please leave a message here,we will reply you as soon as we can.

Preparing secure enquiry form…

Home

Products

whatsapp

contact