Jintaijin | Independent versioned catalog reference

Roesler R 2002 TT vs R 3002 TT: dryer catalog comparison

Compare R 2002 TT and R 3002 TT from the Roesler dryer factsheet, physical page 2, revision 04/2023. Read the exact source labels, original ratings and options side by side. Choose one of two catalog-field profiles, enter optional maxima in millimetres and export the current comparison for supplier review. Use current drawings and workpiece trials to confirm the offered configuration and drying process.

Roesler R 2002 TT vs R 3002 TT: dryer catalog comparison - catalog-dimensions diagram - Jintaijin
Original catalog dimensions diagram for this pair. Data illustration from factsheet page 2, revision04/2023.

Compare exact models and original source fields

Factsheet fieldR 2002 TTR 3002 TT
Belt length (mm)2,900 mm3,890 mm
Length of drying tunnel (mm)2,200 mm3,190 mm
Machine width (mm)1,340 mm1,360 mm
Machine height (mm)1,415 mm1,415 mm
Belt width (mm)1,006 mm1,006 mm
Loading height (mm)1,080 mm1,080 mm
F *1 – (mm)380 mm380 mm
Loading area (mm)400 mm400 mm
Output area – (mm)300 mm300 mm
Width loading area (mm)690 mm690 mm
Overall length (mm)2,272 mm3,270 mm
External diameter (mm)1,006 mm1,006 mm
Length of drying compartment (mm)1,300 mm2,260 mm
Diameter of drying compartment (mm)795 mm795 mm
Volume of drying compartment (l)655 l1,160 l
Diameter of filling aperture (mm)320 mm320 mm
Length of sieve drum (mm)1,120 mm1,130 mm
Diameter of sieve drum (mm)800 mm800 mm
Sieve drum perforation, standard (mm)5 mm5 mm
Heating power (kW)13.5 kW27 kW
Drum speed *2 (Upm)4.0 Upm4.0 Upm

Volume of drying compartment (l): 655 l versus 1,160 l; Heating power (kW): 13.5 kW versus 27 kW; Drum speed *2 (Upm): 4.0 Upm versus 4.0 Upm.

The complete source table is shown with its original labels and notation. Unit-ambiguous fields, stages, ranges and unselected options remain raw; the query only screens cleared numeric dimension fields.

Compare your catalog-field maxima

Select a profile to see the three exact field names. Leave all three inputs blank for comparison, or enter all three positive decimal maxima in mm. Switching profiles clears previous values so one condition cannot inherit another condition’s limits.

Compare source fields or enter all three optional maxima (mm).
Roesler R 2002 TT vs R 3002 TT: dryer catalog comparison - secondary-fields diagram - Jintaijin
Original secondary fields diagram for this pair. Data illustration from factsheet page 2, revision04/2023.

Review the two field conditions separately

For drying compartment, Length of drying compartment (mm) is 1,300 mm versus 2,260 mm; Diameter of drying compartment (mm) is 795 mm versus 795 mm; Diameter of filling aperture (mm) is 320 mm versus 320 mm. These named fields are compared independently; they do not prove installation clearance, part fit or drying suitability.

For drying drum, Overall length (mm) is 2,272 mm versus 3,270 mm; External diameter (mm) is 1,006 mm versus 1,006 mm; Length of sieve drum (mm) is 1,120 mm versus 1,130 mm. These named fields are compared independently; they do not prove installation clearance, part fit or drying suitability.

Every result names its selected fields and retains the original source record. A field maximum is a numerical query on a catalog value. In particular, aperture and passage values do not constitute maximum permissible workpiece geometry. Consult the drawing and a trial with actual parts, drying media and loading arrangements.

Roesler R 2002 TT vs R 3002 TT: dryer catalog comparison - source-ratings diagram - Jintaijin
Original source ratings diagram for this pair. Data illustration from factsheet page 2, revision04/2023.

Prepare a supplier review and sample trial

Use drying-compartment and drum fields with their subsection context. Ask the manufacturer to clarify the external-table Belt length/Belt width labels and approve the offered loading geometry. Review drying-media separation, carryover and residence-time trials. Chamber volume does not establish workpiece loading.

Record the incoming moisture condition, workpiece geometry, material, sensitivity, handling and separation criteria before requesting a trial. Ask for measured drying outcomes and cycle or residence conditions for the offered setup. This catalog record does not establish acceptable residual moisture, finish quality, corrosion behavior, production output or utility consumption.

Source: Roesler dryer factsheet, physical page 2, revision04/2023. The EN.148.19 revision04/2023 dryer brochure, physical page 9, supplies drawing and label context from the same publisher.

Confirm current configuration, options and availability with the manufacturer. No Jintaijin equivalence or manufacturer partnership is established.

Questions about this pair

What source fields differ between R 2002 TT and R 3002 TT?

For drying compartment, Length of drying compartment (mm) is 1,300 mm versus 2,260 mm; Diameter of drying compartment (mm) is 795 mm versus 795 mm; Diameter of filling aperture (mm) is 320 mm versus 320 mm. These named fields are compared independently; they do not prove installation clearance, part fit or drying suitability. Volume of drying compartment (l): 655 l versus 1,160 l; Heating power (kW): 13.5 kW versus 27 kW; Drum speed *2 (Upm): 4.0 Upm versus 4.0 Upm.

Which second field profile is available?

For drying drum, Overall length (mm) is 2,272 mm versus 3,270 mm; External diameter (mm) is 1,006 mm versus 1,006 mm; Length of sieve drum (mm) is 1,120 mm versus 1,130 mm. These named fields are compared independently; they do not prove installation clearance, part fit or drying suitability.

Can these dryer ratings establish throughput or operating cost?

Use drying-compartment and drum fields with their subsection context. Ask the manufacturer to clarify the external-table Belt length/Belt width labels and approve the offered loading geometry. Review drying-media separation, carryover and residence-time trials. Chamber volume does not establish workpiece loading. Catalog powers are ratings, not measured consumption. No selected heat stage, cycle time, kg/hour or output guarantee is calculated.

What does a passing maximum-field test mean?

It means each of the three selected source fields is at or below the maximum you entered for that named field. These are independent catalog queries, including aperture or loading fields where selected. They do not establish that a part fits, a dryer fits an installation space or a process will work. Leave all three inputs blank for a comparison, or enter all three positive decimal maxima. Confirm the source revision, offered options, clearance, workpiece handling and sample-trial requirements with the supplier.

Related trial and inspection tools

Discuss your workpiece and sample-trial requirements with Jintaijin

Prepare a high-appearance machinery review

Use this local checker to identify missing part and inspection information. It prepares a technical-review brief; it does not approve a machine, process recipe or production result.

Complete the part details to prepare a review brief.

Open the enquiry form for this page

Plan batch capacity from trial measurements

#+86-592-2381506

Email : info@surface-polish.com

Headquarters address : No. 31, Xinchang Road, Xinyang Industrial Zone, Haicang District, Xiamen

click here to leave a message

Leave A Message
If you are interested in our products and want to know more details,please leave a message here,we will reply you as soon as we can.

Preparing secure enquiry form…

Home

Products

whatsapp

contact