Walther Trowal BRA 900 vs BRA 2500 cutlery-cleaning system catalog comparison

Review BRA 900 and BRA 2500 from the official BRA brochure marked 05/11, physical PDF page 6. Compare 10 source fields, retaining units, qualitative symbols and conditional bases. This pair differs in 10 adopted fields. Record your sample objective, compatibility or loading questions, safety and site requirements, and acceptance method. The comparison download uses your current form entries.

Walther Trowal BRA 900 vs BRA 2500 cutlery-cleaning system catalog comparison - source-properties-chart - Jintaijin
Original source-data graphic or concept workflow. Versioned 05/11 PDF physical p6; no actual trial result.

Compare source rows and record review questions

Choose source fields and record questions for the supplier and sample owner.

Versioned catalog rows

Source fieldBRA 900BRA 2500
Catalog cutlery capacity (parts/h)12505000
Washing-vibrator modelBRR 100BRR 600
BPK media fill (kg; not part load)200800
Filled washing-vibrator weight (kg)5202100
Fresh-water entry (L/h; catalog basis)60330
Dryer modelBT 100BT 500
GTM 300 granulate fill (kg)36126
Filled dryer weight (kg; printed punctuation)4601.250
Electrical connection (kVA and A)8.4 kVA – 32 A38 kVA – 54 A
Approximate total system space (m²)3.810.4

Capacity entries for this pair

Catalog cutlery capacity (parts/h): BRA 900 1250; BRA 2500 5000. BPK media fill (kg; not part load): BRA 900 200; BRA 2500 800. Fresh-water entry (L/h; catalog basis): BRA 900 60; BRA 2500 330. GTM 300 granulate fill (kg): BRA 900 36; BRA 2500 126.

Configuration entries for this pair

Washing-vibrator model: BRA 900 BRR 100; BRA 2500 BRR 600. Dryer model: BRA 900 BT 100; BRA 2500 BT 500.

Geometry entries for this pair

Filled washing-vibrator weight (kg): BRA 900 520; BRA 2500 2100. Filled dryer weight (kg; printed punctuation): BRA 900 460; BRA 2500 1.250. Approximate total system space (m²): BRA 900 3.8; BRA 2500 10.4.

Drive entries for this pair

Electrical connection (kVA and A): BRA 900 8.4 kVA – 32 A; BRA 2500 38 kVA – 54 A.

Walther Trowal BRA 900 vs BRA 2500 cutlery-cleaning system catalog comparison - source-characteristics-chart - Jintaijin
Original source-data graphic or concept workflow. Versioned 05/11 PDF physical p6; no actual trial result.

Source reading and conditions

Publisher qualitative legend: ++ very good suitability; + good suitability; 0 limited suitability; - no suitability. These categories are not measured values or percentages. Blank remarks are NOT_LISTED. Paste footnote markers remain visible; *) states cycle time more than 24 hours. A merged remark is marked SHARED_REMARK_NOT_INDEPENDENTLY_MAPPED.

Walther Trowal BRA 900 vs BRA 2500 cutlery-cleaning system catalog comparison - sample-review-flow-diagram - Jintaijin
Original source-data graphic or concept workflow. Versioned 05/11 PDF physical p6; no actual trial result.

Source and sample-review scope

Official BRA brochure, 05/11, physical page 6, captured 2026-10-05.

Use this independent Walther Trowal reference to prepare a supplier and sample discussion. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, an equivalent product, current offers or a customer trial. Obtain a current specification and safety documentation, then define a real sample, part or liquid-stream objective, constraints and acceptance method. User annotations remain USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED. No mixing, dosing, compatibility, hygiene or wastewater-discharge approval follows from this page.

Questions about this pair

Which adopted fields differ for BRA 900 and BRA 2500?

Catalog cutlery capacity (parts/h): BRA 900 1250 versus BRA 2500 5000. Washing-vibrator model: BRA 900 BRR 100 versus BRA 2500 BRR 600. BPK media fill (kg; not part load): BRA 900 200 versus BRA 2500 800. Filled washing-vibrator weight (kg): BRA 900 520 versus BRA 2500 2100. Fresh-water entry (L/h; catalog basis): BRA 900 60 versus BRA 2500 330. Dryer model: BRA 900 BT 100 versus BRA 2500 BT 500. GTM 300 granulate fill (kg): BRA 900 36 versus BRA 2500 126. Filled dryer weight (kg; printed punctuation): BRA 900 460 versus BRA 2500 1.250. Electrical connection (kVA and A): BRA 900 8.4 kVA – 32 A versus BRA 2500 38 kVA – 54 A. Approximate total system space (m²): BRA 900 3.8 versus BRA 2500 10.4.

How should source symbols and missing remarks be read?

Publisher qualitative legend: ++ very good suitability; + good suitability; 0 limited suitability; - no suitability. These categories are not measured values or percentages. Blank remarks are NOT_LISTED. Paste footnote markers remain visible; *) states cycle time more than 24 hours. A merged remark is marked SHARED_REMARK_NOT_INDEPENDENTLY_MAPPED.

What source conditions must remain visible?

Versioned manufacturer catalog entries are neither tested customer performance nor an established current configuration. No installed-option, site-fit, process recipe, metered energy, current offer, Jintaijin equivalent or regulatory approval is established. Units, decimal punctuation, multiplicity, alternatives and conditional row bases remain literal; no cross-family scoring is calculated. This 2011 source is not food-hygiene, sterilization or DIN compliance evidence. Ambiguously labelled hourly current-consumption row, shared temperatures and chemical rates are excluded. Filled weights are not empty weights. Printed 1.250 uses German thousands punctuation, not 1.25 kg.

Can these entries predict a process result or cost?

Versioned catalog values and symbols retain their source row bases; they are not measured trials or approved process settings. Symbols ++, +, 0 and - are qualitative; no numeric score, ranking or dosage is calculated. Descriptive pH is not a numeric range; media fill, batch volume and mass retain separate meanings. No part compatibility, finish, hygiene, discharge compliance, installed configuration or current offer is established. Independent Walther Trowal reference; Jintaijin supply, partnership and equivalence are not established. User annotations are not verified trials or customer facts.

What must the current supplier and sample review establish?

Use this independent Walther Trowal reference to prepare a supplier and sample discussion. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, an equivalent product, current offers or a customer trial. Obtain a current specification and safety documentation, then define a real sample, part or liquid-stream objective, constraints and acceptance method. User annotations remain USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED. No mixing, dosing, compatibility, hygiene or wastewater-discharge approval follows from this page.

Related review tools

Prepare a sample-review enquiry

Provide a drawing or liquid-stream description, objective, constraints and acceptance method for a SurfacePolish discussion.

Open the SurfacePolish enquiry form

#+86-592-2381506

Email : info@surface-polish.com

Headquarters address : No. 31, Xinchang Road, Xinyang Industrial Zone, Haicang District, Xiamen

click here to leave a message

Leave A Message
If you are interested in our products and want to know more details,please leave a message here,we will reply you as soon as we can.

Preparing secure enquiry form…

Home

Products

whatsapp

contact