Walther Trowal CB 100 vs CB 400 circular vibrator catalog comparison

Review CB 100 and CB 400 from the official CB brochure marked 08/18, physical PDF page2. Compare 7 source fields and preserve their units and conditional bases. Record your part or water-stream objective, loading or contaminant questions, site requirements and acceptance method. The download uses your current form inputs. Current-web captures and differences remain separate for supplier confirmation.

Walther Trowal CB 100 vs CB 400 circular vibrator catalog comparison - capacity-basis-chart - Jintaijin
Original source-data chart or concept workflow. Versioned 08/18 PDF p2; no actual trial result.

Compare source rows and record your review

Choose a group and record questions for your supplier and sample owner.

Versioned catalog rows

Source fieldCB 100CB 400
Gross work bowl volume (L)100400
Conditional usable volume (L)83260
Maximum workpiece diagonal (mm; source footnote)160260
Screen area (cm²; not m²)1,9603,270
Drive power at 1500 RPM (kW)1.54.0
Maximum centrifugal force (N)21,50049,000
Total empty weight (kg)5101,190

Capacity entries for this pair

Gross work bowl volume (L): CB 100 100; CB 400 400. Conditional usable volume (L): CB 100 83; CB 400 260. CB600 usable volume is345L in this PDF versus350L on the current website. Several empty weights and CB100 drive power also differ; no merged current model is inferred. Usable volume depends on geometry, material and nicking risk; maximum workpiece size is measured diagonally. Neither guarantees loading, clearance or separation. Screen area uses cm², unlike TT-A and AV m². Values are retained in original units without cross-family scoring. The speed row is merged and contains trailing footnote markers; it is excluded from per-model records. Accessory listings and optional gate clearing are not installed configuration approvals.

Geometry entries for this pair

Maximum workpiece diagonal (mm; source footnote): CB 100 160; CB 400 260. Screen area (cm²; not m²): CB 100 1,960; CB 400 3,270. Total empty weight (kg): CB 100 510; CB 400 1,190. CB600 usable volume is345L in this PDF versus350L on the current website. Several empty weights and CB100 drive power also differ; no merged current model is inferred. Usable volume depends on geometry, material and nicking risk; maximum workpiece size is measured diagonally. Neither guarantees loading, clearance or separation. Screen area uses cm², unlike TT-A and AV m². Values are retained in original units without cross-family scoring. The speed row is merged and contains trailing footnote markers; it is excluded from per-model records. Accessory listings and optional gate clearing are not installed configuration approvals.

Drive entries for this pair

Drive power at 1500 RPM (kW): CB 100 1.5; CB 400 4.0. Maximum centrifugal force (N): CB 100 21,500; CB 400 49,000. CB600 usable volume is345L in this PDF versus350L on the current website. Several empty weights and CB100 drive power also differ; no merged current model is inferred. Usable volume depends on geometry, material and nicking risk; maximum workpiece size is measured diagonally. Neither guarantees loading, clearance or separation. Screen area uses cm², unlike TT-A and AV m². Values are retained in original units without cross-family scoring. The speed row is merged and contains trailing footnote markers; it is excluded from per-model records. Accessory listings and optional gate clearing are not installed configuration approvals.

Walther Trowal CB 100 vs CB 400 circular vibrator catalog comparison - power-basis-chart - Jintaijin
Original source-data chart or concept workflow. Versioned 08/18 PDF p2; no actual trial result.

Keep current-web differences visible

CB 100 power: PDF 1.5; current-web Max. drive power at 1,500 rpm 2.2 kW. CB 400 weight: PDF 1,190; current-web Total weight (empty) (kg) 1,150. Model labels and row labels retain their respective captured versions. Confirm an actual supplier specification before using a current system configuration.

Official current CB product page
Walther Trowal CB 100 vs CB 400 circular vibrator catalog comparison - source-review-flow-diagram - Jintaijin
Original source-data chart or concept workflow. Versioned 08/18 PDF p2; no actual trial result.

Source and sample-review scope

Official CB brochure, 08/18, physical page2, captured2026-10-05.

This independent Walther Trowal reference helps prepare a source-bound equipment discussion. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, equivalent machinery, current offers or customer trials. The tool reports printed values without machine ranking or numerical scoring. Your annotations remain USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED. Bring a real part or process-water sample, loading or contaminant constraints, site supply details and an acceptance method to the supplier review.

Questions about this model pair

What source distinguishes CB 100 from CB 400?

Gross work bowl volume (L): CB 100 100; CB 400 400. Conditional usable volume (L): CB 100 83; CB 400 260. CB600 usable volume is345L in this PDF versus350L on the current website. Several empty weights and CB100 drive power also differ; no merged current model is inferred. Usable volume depends on geometry, material and nicking risk; maximum workpiece size is measured diagonally. Neither guarantees loading, clearance or separation. Screen area uses cm², unlike TT-A and AV m². Values are retained in original units without cross-family scoring. The speed row is merged and contains trailing footnote markers; it is excluded from per-model records. Accessory listings and optional gate clearing are not installed configuration approvals.

Can these values predict a load, treatment result or cost?

Use the exact versioned source and row basis; current website values stay separate. Media quantities, volumes and conditional capacity ranges are not approved loads or throughput. Catalog power, speed and processing time are not metered consumption, costs or trial recipes. Dimensions and tank capacities do not establish site fit, installed options or treatment quality. Independent Walther Trowal reference; Jintaijin supply, partnership, equivalence and current offer are not established. User annotations are not verified trials or customer facts.

Which source differences need supplier confirmation?

CB 100 power: PDF 1.5; current-web Max. drive power at 1,500 rpm 2.2 kW. CB 400 weight: PDF 1,190; current-web Total weight (empty) (kg) 1,150. Model labels and row labels retain their respective captured versions. Confirm an actual supplier specification before using a current system configuration.

What must a sample review establish?

This independent Walther Trowal reference helps prepare a source-bound equipment discussion. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, equivalent machinery, current offers or customer trials. The tool reports printed values without machine ranking or numerical scoring. Your annotations remain USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED. Bring a real part or process-water sample, loading or contaminant constraints, site supply details and an acceptance method to the supplier review.

Does this page confirm a currently offered Jintaijin equivalent?

No. The source is a versioned third-party catalog. No current Jintaijin equivalent, offered configuration or partnership is established.

Related review tools

Prepare a sample review enquiry

Provide a drawing or process-water description, objective, constraints and acceptance method for a SurfacePolish discussion.

Open the SurfacePolish enquiry form

#+86-592-2381506

Email : info@surface-polish.com

Headquarters address : No. 31, Xinchang Road, Xinyang Industrial Zone, Haicang District, Xiamen

click here to leave a message

Leave A Message
If you are interested in our products and want to know more details,please leave a message here,we will reply you as soon as we can.

Preparing secure enquiry form…

Home

Products

whatsapp

contact