Walther Trowal CB 400 vs CB 1800 circular vibrator catalog comparison
Review CB 400 and CB 1800 from the official CB brochure marked 08/18, physical PDF page2. Compare 7 source fields and preserve their units and conditional bases. Record your part or water-stream objective, loading or contaminant questions, site requirements and acceptance method. The download uses your current form inputs. Current-web captures and differences remain separate for supplier confirmation.
Compare source rows and record your review
Versioned catalog rows
| Source field | CB 400 | CB 1800 |
|---|---|---|
| Gross work bowl volume (L) | 400 | 1,800 |
| Conditional usable volume (L) | 260 | 1,050 |
| Maximum workpiece diagonal (mm; source footnote) | 260 | 380 |
| Screen area (cm²; not m²) | 3,270 | 7,500 |
| Drive power at 1500 RPM (kW) | 4.0 | 11.0 |
| Maximum centrifugal force (N) | 49,000 | 250,000 |
| Total empty weight (kg) | 1,190 | 4,400 |
Capacity entries for this pair
Gross work bowl volume (L): CB 400 400; CB 1800 1,800. Conditional usable volume (L): CB 400 260; CB 1800 1,050. CB600 usable volume is345L in this PDF versus350L on the current website. Several empty weights and CB100 drive power also differ; no merged current model is inferred. Usable volume depends on geometry, material and nicking risk; maximum workpiece size is measured diagonally. Neither guarantees loading, clearance or separation. Screen area uses cm², unlike TT-A and AV m². Values are retained in original units without cross-family scoring. The speed row is merged and contains trailing footnote markers; it is excluded from per-model records. Accessory listings and optional gate clearing are not installed configuration approvals.
Geometry entries for this pair
Maximum workpiece diagonal (mm; source footnote): CB 400 260; CB 1800 380. Screen area (cm²; not m²): CB 400 3,270; CB 1800 7,500. Total empty weight (kg): CB 400 1,190; CB 1800 4,400. CB600 usable volume is345L in this PDF versus350L on the current website. Several empty weights and CB100 drive power also differ; no merged current model is inferred. Usable volume depends on geometry, material and nicking risk; maximum workpiece size is measured diagonally. Neither guarantees loading, clearance or separation. Screen area uses cm², unlike TT-A and AV m². Values are retained in original units without cross-family scoring. The speed row is merged and contains trailing footnote markers; it is excluded from per-model records. Accessory listings and optional gate clearing are not installed configuration approvals.
Drive entries for this pair
Drive power at 1500 RPM (kW): CB 400 4.0; CB 1800 11.0. Maximum centrifugal force (N): CB 400 49,000; CB 1800 250,000. CB600 usable volume is345L in this PDF versus350L on the current website. Several empty weights and CB100 drive power also differ; no merged current model is inferred. Usable volume depends on geometry, material and nicking risk; maximum workpiece size is measured diagonally. Neither guarantees loading, clearance or separation. Screen area uses cm², unlike TT-A and AV m². Values are retained in original units without cross-family scoring. The speed row is merged and contains trailing footnote markers; it is excluded from per-model records. Accessory listings and optional gate clearing are not installed configuration approvals.
Keep current-web differences visible
CB 400 weight: PDF 1,190; current-web Total weight (empty) (kg) 1,150. CB 1800 weight: PDF 4,400; current-web Total weight (empty) (kg) 4,180. Model labels and row labels retain their respective captured versions. Confirm an actual supplier specification before using a current system configuration.
Official current CB product page
Source and sample-review scope
Official CB brochure, 08/18, physical page2, captured2026-10-05.
This independent Walther Trowal reference helps prepare a source-bound equipment discussion. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, equivalent machinery, current offers or customer trials. The tool reports printed values without machine ranking or numerical scoring. Your annotations remain USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED. Bring a real part or process-water sample, loading or contaminant constraints, site supply details and an acceptance method to the supplier review.
Questions about this model pair
What source distinguishes CB 400 from CB 1800?
Gross work bowl volume (L): CB 400 400; CB 1800 1,800. Conditional usable volume (L): CB 400 260; CB 1800 1,050. CB600 usable volume is345L in this PDF versus350L on the current website. Several empty weights and CB100 drive power also differ; no merged current model is inferred. Usable volume depends on geometry, material and nicking risk; maximum workpiece size is measured diagonally. Neither guarantees loading, clearance or separation. Screen area uses cm², unlike TT-A and AV m². Values are retained in original units without cross-family scoring. The speed row is merged and contains trailing footnote markers; it is excluded from per-model records. Accessory listings and optional gate clearing are not installed configuration approvals.
Can these values predict a load, treatment result or cost?
Use the exact versioned source and row basis; current website values stay separate. Media quantities, volumes and conditional capacity ranges are not approved loads or throughput. Catalog power, speed and processing time are not metered consumption, costs or trial recipes. Dimensions and tank capacities do not establish site fit, installed options or treatment quality. Independent Walther Trowal reference; Jintaijin supply, partnership, equivalence and current offer are not established. User annotations are not verified trials or customer facts.
Which source differences need supplier confirmation?
CB 400 weight: PDF 1,190; current-web Total weight (empty) (kg) 1,150. CB 1800 weight: PDF 4,400; current-web Total weight (empty) (kg) 4,180. Model labels and row labels retain their respective captured versions. Confirm an actual supplier specification before using a current system configuration.
What must a sample review establish?
This independent Walther Trowal reference helps prepare a source-bound equipment discussion. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, equivalent machinery, current offers or customer trials. The tool reports printed values without machine ranking or numerical scoring. Your annotations remain USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED. Bring a real part or process-water sample, loading or contaminant constraints, site supply details and an acceptance method to the supplier review.
Does this page confirm a currently offered Jintaijin equivalent?
No. The source is a versioned third-party catalog. No current Jintaijin equivalent, offered configuration or partnership is established.
Related review tools
Prepare a sample review enquiry
Provide a drawing or process-water description, objective, constraints and acceptance method for a SurfacePolish discussion.
Open the SurfacePolish enquiry form
+86-592-2381506 
IPv6 network supported 