Walther Trowal CF 400 vs CF 800 circular vibrator catalog comparison
Compare CF 400 and CF 800 using the official Walther Trowal CF brochure marked 11/18, physical PDF page2. Filter 10 source fields, record your part, separation, site and acceptance questions, and download the current review. Conditional volume, diagonal limits and drive rows remain versioned references. The separately captured current web table is not merged into a current offer.
Compare catalog fields and record your review questions
Versioned catalog rows
| Source field | CF 400 | CF 800 |
|---|---|---|
| Work bowl gross volume (L) | 400 | 800 |
| Conditional usable volume (L) | 260 | 470 |
| Largest workpiece dimension measured diagonally (mm) | 260 | 315 |
| Total separation screen area (cm2) | 3,270 | 4,900 |
| Total weight (kg; empty basis not stated in CM/CF table) | 1,190 | 2,110 |
| Standard drive power at 1,500 rpm (kW) | 2.6 kW | 6.0 kW |
| Standard motor speed entry (rpm; equipment basis) | 1,000 / 1,500 (two rotary speeds; joint row) | 1,000 / 1,500 (two rotary speeds; joint row) |
| Maximum centrifugal force (N) | 49,000 | 100,000 |
| Catalog accessory magnetic separator reference | MS 134x24 | MS 168x31 |
| Catalog accessory vibratory drier reference | G 200 | G 500 |
Keep bowl volume separate from part batch load
The 11/18 PDF lists CF 400 with 400 L gross and 260 L conditional usable volume; CF 800 has 800 L gross and 470 L conditional usable volume. The footnote ties the media-to-workpiece ratio to geometry, material and delicacy or nicking risk. Neither column supplies a universal part-only load, bulk density, daily output or cycle time. Record the actual part and media constraints before a representative sample trial.
Review the diagonal and separation interface
The listed diagonal limits are 260 mm for CF 400 and 315 mm for CF 800. A single diagonal value cannot prove motion clearance, nesting, lodging risk, contact damage or complete unloading. Separation-screen areas are 3,270 cm2 and 4,900 cm2, respectively. Screen area does not establish separation speed, aperture, media retention or workpiece carry-out. The CF brochure states a pneumatic separation flap is standard for CF 200 and larger; CF 100 is excluded from that statement. Confirm the actual flap and motor configuration.
Keep drive rows tied to their version
CF 400 lists 2.6 kW at 1,500 rpm; CF 800 lists 6.0 kW. Their standard speed entries are 1,000 / 1,500 (two rotary speeds; joint row) and 1,000 / 1,500 (two rotary speeds; joint row). Two-speed alternatives are not a continuous recommended processing range. Inverter maxima are equipment limits, not a validated setpoint. Drive power is not measured energy consumption or total connected load, and no energy cost or productivity is calculated.
Review accessories and supplier drawings
The catalog drier references are G 200 for CF 400 and G 500 for CF 800. Magnetic separator references are MS 134x24 and MS 168x31. These are brochure accessory references, not installation, compatibility, stock or quotation approval. Review discharge interface, part/media separation, drying suitability and material-specific acceptance with the responsible supplier. Lettered drawing dimensions are omitted from this tool; no floor plan or maintenance clearance is inferred.
Current official web table and version differences
No difference was found in the selected numeric rows for this pair. This is a limited comparison, not confirmation that all current specifications agree; drawing, speed, accessory and configuration details remain separate.
Official current CF product page, captured 2026-10-05. This comparison covers selected numeric rows; it is not an exhaustive current configuration reconciliation. Confirm offered model, drawing revision, accessories and process trial separately.
Source and scope
Official CF brochure, 11/18, physical page2; captured 2026-10-05. This is an independent Walther Trowal reference. No Jintaijin supply, partnership, equivalent machine, actual finishing result, medical qualification or current offer is established. User notes are USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED; diagrams are original source-data references.
Questions about this model pair
How do CF 400 and CF 800 compare in bowl volume?
The 11/18 PDF lists CF 400 with 400 L gross and 260 L conditional usable volume; CF 800 has 800 L gross and 470 L conditional usable volume. The footnote ties the media-to-workpiece ratio to geometry, material and delicacy or nicking risk. Neither column supplies a universal part-only load, bulk density, daily output or cycle time. Record the actual part and media constraints before a representative sample trial.
Do their diagonal limits establish part fit?
The listed diagonal limits are 260 mm for CF 400 and 315 mm for CF 800. A single diagonal value cannot prove motion clearance, nesting, lodging risk, contact damage or complete unloading. Separation-screen areas are 3,270 cm2 and 4,900 cm2, respectively. Screen area does not establish separation speed, aperture, media retention or workpiece carry-out. The CF brochure states a pneumatic separation flap is standard for CF 200 and larger; CF 100 is excluded from that statement. Confirm the actual flap and motor configuration.
Can their catalog speeds be used as process settings?
CF 400 lists 2.6 kW at 1,500 rpm; CF 800 lists 6.0 kW. Their standard speed entries are 1,000 / 1,500 (two rotary speeds; joint row) and 1,000 / 1,500 (two rotary speeds; joint row). Two-speed alternatives are not a continuous recommended processing range. Inverter maxima are equipment limits, not a validated setpoint. Drive power is not measured energy consumption or total connected load, and no energy cost or productivity is calculated.
Which accessory references require confirmation?
The catalog drier references are G 200 for CF 400 and G 500 for CF 800. Magnetic separator references are MS 134x24 and MS 168x31. These are brochure accessory references, not installation, compatibility, stock or quotation approval. Review discharge interface, part/media separation, drying suitability and material-specific acceptance with the responsible supplier. Lettered drawing dimensions are omitted from this tool; no floor plan or maintenance clearance is inferred.
Does the current official website agree with this PDF version?
No difference was found in the selected numeric rows for this pair. This is a limited comparison, not confirmation that all current specifications agree; drawing, speed, accessory and configuration details remain separate.
Related review tools
Prepare a sample review enquiry
For SurfacePolish equipment discussions, provide the part drawing, finishing objective, separation restrictions and acceptance method. This reference does not confirm supply of third-party machines.
Open the SurfacePolish enquiry form
+86-592-2381506 
IPv6 network supported 