Walther Trowal RT 05 vs RT 30 semi-automatic flocculation system catalog comparison

Review RT 05 and RT 30 from the official Semi-automatic flocculation systems brochure marked 01/15, physical PDF page 3. Compare 3 source fields, retaining units, qualitative symbols and conditional bases. This pair differs in 3 adopted fields. Record your sample objective, compatibility or loading questions, safety and site requirements, and acceptance method. The comparison download uses your current form entries.

Walther Trowal RT 05 vs RT 30 semi-automatic flocculation system catalog comparison - source-properties-chart - Jintaijin
Original source-data graphic or concept workflow. Versioned 01/15 PDF physical p3; no actual trial result.

Compare source rows and record review questions

Choose source fields and record questions for the supplier and sample owner.

Versioned catalog rows

Source fieldRT 05RT 30
Power requirements (kVA)2.53.5
Catalog capacity (L/batch; not L/h)5003,000
Printed filtration alternativesFilter bag in frameFilter bag in frame / filter press

Drive entries for this pair

Power requirements (kVA): RT 05 2.5; RT 30 3.5.

Capacity entries for this pair

Catalog capacity (L/batch; not L/h): RT 05 500; RT 30 3,000.

Configuration entries for this pair

Printed filtration alternatives: RT 05 Filter bag in frame; RT 30 Filter bag in frame / filter press.

Walther Trowal RT 05 vs RT 30 semi-automatic flocculation system catalog comparison - source-characteristics-chart - Jintaijin
Original source-data graphic or concept workflow. Versioned 01/15 PDF physical p3; no actual trial result.

Source reading and conditions

Publisher qualitative legend: ++ very good suitability; + good suitability; 0 limited suitability; - no suitability. These categories are not measured values or percentages. Blank remarks are NOT_LISTED. Paste footnote markers remain visible; *) states cycle time more than 24 hours. A merged remark is marked SHARED_REMARK_NOT_INDEPENDENTLY_MAPPED.

Walther Trowal RT 05 vs RT 30 semi-automatic flocculation system catalog comparison - sample-review-flow-diagram - Jintaijin
Original source-data graphic or concept workflow. Versioned 01/15 PDF physical p3; no actual trial result.

Source and sample-review scope

Official Semi-automatic flocculation systems brochure, 01/15, physical page 3, captured 2026-10-05.

Use this independent Walther Trowal reference to prepare a supplier and sample discussion. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, an equivalent product, current offers or a customer trial. Obtain a current specification and safety documentation, then define a real sample, part or liquid-stream objective, constraints and acceptance method. User annotations remain USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED. No mixing, dosing, compatibility, hygiene or wastewater-discharge approval follows from this page.

Questions about this pair

Which adopted fields differ for RT 05 and RT 30?

Power requirements (kVA): RT 05 2.5 versus RT 30 3.5. Catalog capacity (L/batch; not L/h): RT 05 500 versus RT 30 3,000. Printed filtration alternatives: RT 05 Filter bag in frame versus RT 30 Filter bag in frame / filter press.

How should source symbols and missing remarks be read?

Publisher qualitative legend: ++ very good suitability; + good suitability; 0 limited suitability; - no suitability. These categories are not measured values or percentages. Blank remarks are NOT_LISTED. Paste footnote markers remain visible; *) states cycle time more than 24 hours. A merged remark is marked SHARED_REMARK_NOT_INDEPENDENTLY_MAPPED.

What source conditions must remain visible?

Versioned manufacturer catalog entries are neither tested customer performance nor an established current configuration. No installed-option, site-fit, process recipe, metered energy, current offer, Jintaijin equivalent or regulatory approval is established. Units, decimal punctuation, multiplicity, alternatives and conditional row bases remain literal; no cross-family scoring is calculated. Batch volume is not hourly capacity. No cycle time, daily throughput or installed filter option is inferred. Shared variable-dimension row is excluded; no discharge approval or chemical recipe is established.

Can these entries predict a process result or cost?

Versioned catalog values and symbols retain their source row bases; they are not measured trials or approved process settings. Symbols ++, +, 0 and - are qualitative; no numeric score, ranking or dosage is calculated. Descriptive pH is not a numeric range; media fill, batch volume and mass retain separate meanings. No part compatibility, finish, hygiene, discharge compliance, installed configuration or current offer is established. Independent Walther Trowal reference; Jintaijin supply, partnership and equivalence are not established. User annotations are not verified trials or customer facts.

What must the current supplier and sample review establish?

Use this independent Walther Trowal reference to prepare a supplier and sample discussion. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, an equivalent product, current offers or a customer trial. Obtain a current specification and safety documentation, then define a real sample, part or liquid-stream objective, constraints and acceptance method. User annotations remain USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED. No mixing, dosing, compatibility, hygiene or wastewater-discharge approval follows from this page.

Related review tools

Prepare a sample-review enquiry

Provide a drawing or liquid-stream description, objective, constraints and acceptance method for a SurfacePolish discussion.

Open the SurfacePolish enquiry form

#+86-592-2381506

Email : info@surface-polish.com

Headquarters address : No. 31, Xinchang Road, Xinyang Industrial Zone, Haicang District, Xiamen

click here to leave a message

Leave A Message
If you are interested in our products and want to know more details,please leave a message here,we will reply you as soon as we can.

Preparing secure enquiry form…

Home

Products

whatsapp

contact