Walther Trowal RT 10 vs RT 20 semi-automatic flocculation system catalog comparison
Review RT 10 and RT 20 from the official Semi-automatic flocculation systems brochure marked 01/15, physical PDF page 3. Compare 3 source fields, retaining units, qualitative symbols and conditional bases. This pair differs in 1 adopted fields. Record your sample objective, compatibility or loading questions, safety and site requirements, and acceptance method. The comparison download uses your current form entries.
Compare source rows and record review questions
Versioned catalog rows
| Source field | RT 10 | RT 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Power requirements (kVA) | 3 | 3 |
| Catalog capacity (L/batch; not L/h) | 1,000 | 2,000 |
| Printed filtration alternatives | Filter bag in frame / filter press | Filter bag in frame / filter press |
Drive entries for this pair
Power requirements (kVA): RT 10 3; RT 20 3.
Capacity entries for this pair
Catalog capacity (L/batch; not L/h): RT 10 1,000; RT 20 2,000.
Configuration entries for this pair
Printed filtration alternatives: RT 10 Filter bag in frame / filter press; RT 20 Filter bag in frame / filter press.
Source reading and conditions
Publisher qualitative legend: ++ very good suitability; + good suitability; 0 limited suitability; - no suitability. These categories are not measured values or percentages. Blank remarks are NOT_LISTED. Paste footnote markers remain visible; *) states cycle time more than 24 hours. A merged remark is marked SHARED_REMARK_NOT_INDEPENDENTLY_MAPPED.
- Versioned manufacturer catalog entries are neither tested customer performance nor an established current configuration.
- No installed-option, site-fit, process recipe, metered energy, current offer, Jintaijin equivalent or regulatory approval is established.
- Units, decimal punctuation, multiplicity, alternatives and conditional row bases remain literal; no cross-family scoring is calculated.
- Batch volume is not hourly capacity. No cycle time, daily throughput or installed filter option is inferred. Shared variable-dimension row is excluded; no discharge approval or chemical recipe is established.
Source and sample-review scope
Official Semi-automatic flocculation systems brochure, 01/15, physical page 3, captured 2026-10-05.
Use this independent Walther Trowal reference to prepare a supplier and sample discussion. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, an equivalent product, current offers or a customer trial. Obtain a current specification and safety documentation, then define a real sample, part or liquid-stream objective, constraints and acceptance method. User annotations remain USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED. No mixing, dosing, compatibility, hygiene or wastewater-discharge approval follows from this page.
Questions about this pair
Which adopted fields differ for RT 10 and RT 20?
Catalog capacity (L/batch; not L/h): RT 10 1,000 versus RT 20 2,000.
How should source symbols and missing remarks be read?
Publisher qualitative legend: ++ very good suitability; + good suitability; 0 limited suitability; - no suitability. These categories are not measured values or percentages. Blank remarks are NOT_LISTED. Paste footnote markers remain visible; *) states cycle time more than 24 hours. A merged remark is marked SHARED_REMARK_NOT_INDEPENDENTLY_MAPPED.
What source conditions must remain visible?
Versioned manufacturer catalog entries are neither tested customer performance nor an established current configuration. No installed-option, site-fit, process recipe, metered energy, current offer, Jintaijin equivalent or regulatory approval is established. Units, decimal punctuation, multiplicity, alternatives and conditional row bases remain literal; no cross-family scoring is calculated. Batch volume is not hourly capacity. No cycle time, daily throughput or installed filter option is inferred. Shared variable-dimension row is excluded; no discharge approval or chemical recipe is established.
Can these entries predict a process result or cost?
Versioned catalog values and symbols retain their source row bases; they are not measured trials or approved process settings. Symbols ++, +, 0 and - are qualitative; no numeric score, ranking or dosage is calculated. Descriptive pH is not a numeric range; media fill, batch volume and mass retain separate meanings. No part compatibility, finish, hygiene, discharge compliance, installed configuration or current offer is established. Independent Walther Trowal reference; Jintaijin supply, partnership and equivalence are not established. User annotations are not verified trials or customer facts.
What must the current supplier and sample review establish?
Use this independent Walther Trowal reference to prepare a supplier and sample discussion. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, an equivalent product, current offers or a customer trial. Obtain a current specification and safety documentation, then define a real sample, part or liquid-stream objective, constraints and acceptance method. User annotations remain USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED. No mixing, dosing, compatibility, hygiene or wastewater-discharge approval follows from this page.
Related review tools
Prepare a sample-review enquiry
Provide a drawing or liquid-stream description, objective, constraints and acceptance method for a SurfacePolish discussion.
Open the SurfacePolish enquiry form