Walther Trowal trowal KFL vs trowal SGK recycling compound catalog comparison

Review trowal KFL and trowal SGK from the official Recycling liquids brochure marked 01/22, physical PDF page 11. Compare 7 source fields, retaining units, qualitative symbols and conditional bases. This pair differs in 6 adopted fields. Record your sample objective, compatibility or loading questions, safety and site requirements, and acceptance method. The comparison download uses your current form entries.

Walther Trowal trowal KFL vs trowal SGK recycling compound catalog comparison - source-properties-chart - Jintaijin
Original source-data graphic or concept workflow. Versioned 01/22 PDF physical p11; no actual trial result.

Compare source rows and record review questions

Choose source fields and record questions for the supplier and sample owner.

Versioned catalog rows

Source fieldtrowal KFLtrowal SGK
Descriptive pH labelSlightly alkalineAlkaline
Corrosion-protection symbol++
Cleaning / degreasing symbol+++
Brightening symbol+++
Water hardness (degrees dH; source wording)10–15Complete hardness range
Printed remarkUniversally usableGood corrosion protection on non-ferrous metals; degreasing compound; high surface energy on aluminum / zinc diecastings
Printed table sectionFirst tableNo soap; not affected by hardness

Properties entries for this pair

Descriptive pH label: trowal KFL Slightly alkaline; trowal SGK Alkaline. Water hardness (degrees dH; source wording): trowal KFL 10–15; trowal SGK Complete hardness range. Printed table section: trowal KFL First table; trowal SGK No soap; not affected by hardness.

Characteristics entries for this pair

Corrosion-protection symbol: trowal KFL +; trowal SGK +. Cleaning / degreasing symbol: trowal KFL +; trowal SGK ++. Brightening symbol: trowal KFL ++; trowal SGK +.

Remarks entries for this pair

Printed remark: trowal KFL Universally usable; trowal SGK Good corrosion protection on non-ferrous metals; degreasing compound; high surface energy on aluminum / zinc diecastings.

Walther Trowal trowal KFL vs trowal SGK recycling compound catalog comparison - source-characteristics-chart - Jintaijin
Original source-data graphic or concept workflow. Versioned 01/22 PDF physical p11; no actual trial result.

Source reading and conditions

Publisher qualitative legend: ++ very good suitability; + good suitability; 0 limited suitability; - no suitability. These categories are not measured values or percentages. Blank remarks are NOT_LISTED. Paste footnote markers remain visible; *) states cycle time more than 24 hours. A merged remark is marked SHARED_REMARK_NOT_INDEPENDENTLY_MAPPED.

Walther Trowal trowal KFL vs trowal SGK recycling compound catalog comparison - sample-review-flow-diagram - Jintaijin
Original source-data graphic or concept workflow. Versioned 01/22 PDF physical p11; no actual trial result.

Source and sample-review scope

Official Recycling liquids brochure, 01/22, physical page 11, captured 2026-10-05.

Use this independent Walther Trowal reference to prepare a supplier and sample discussion. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, an equivalent product, current offers or a customer trial. Obtain a current specification and safety documentation, then define a real sample, part or liquid-stream objective, constraints and acceptance method. User annotations remain USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED. No mixing, dosing, compatibility, hygiene or wastewater-discharge approval follows from this page.

Questions about this pair

Which adopted fields differ for trowal KFL and trowal SGK?

Descriptive pH label: trowal KFL Slightly alkaline versus trowal SGK Alkaline. Cleaning / degreasing symbol: trowal KFL + versus trowal SGK ++. Brightening symbol: trowal KFL ++ versus trowal SGK +. Water hardness (degrees dH; source wording): trowal KFL 10–15 versus trowal SGK Complete hardness range. Printed remark: trowal KFL Universally usable versus trowal SGK Good corrosion protection on non-ferrous metals; degreasing compound; high surface energy on aluminum / zinc diecastings. Printed table section: trowal KFL First table versus trowal SGK No soap; not affected by hardness.

How should source symbols and missing remarks be read?

Publisher qualitative legend: ++ very good suitability; + good suitability; 0 limited suitability; - no suitability. These categories are not measured values or percentages. Blank remarks are NOT_LISTED. Paste footnote markers remain visible; *) states cycle time more than 24 hours. A merged remark is marked SHARED_REMARK_NOT_INDEPENDENTLY_MAPPED.

What source conditions must remain visible?

Publisher symbols ++, +, 0 and - are qualitative categories, never numeric scores or measured performance. Blank remarks are NOT_LISTED, not the printed minus symbol. A descriptive pH label is not a numeric pH range. No dilution, mixing, dosing recipe, SDS, part approval or current offer is established. The source is an independent Walther Trowal reference, not proof of Jintaijin supply, equivalence, partnership or a customer trial. The final five grades belong to a separately labelled no-soap, hardness-independent subsection. Publisher material remarks are not an approval for a particular part.

Can these entries predict a process result or cost?

Versioned catalog values and symbols retain their source row bases; they are not measured trials or approved process settings. Symbols ++, +, 0 and - are qualitative; no numeric score, ranking or dosage is calculated. Descriptive pH is not a numeric range; media fill, batch volume and mass retain separate meanings. No part compatibility, finish, hygiene, discharge compliance, installed configuration or current offer is established. Independent Walther Trowal reference; Jintaijin supply, partnership and equivalence are not established. User annotations are not verified trials or customer facts.

What must the current supplier and sample review establish?

Use this independent Walther Trowal reference to prepare a supplier and sample discussion. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, an equivalent product, current offers or a customer trial. Obtain a current specification and safety documentation, then define a real sample, part or liquid-stream objective, constraints and acceptance method. User annotations remain USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED. No mixing, dosing, compatibility, hygiene or wastewater-discharge approval follows from this page.

Related review tools

Prepare a sample-review enquiry

Provide a drawing or liquid-stream description, objective, constraints and acceptance method for a SurfacePolish discussion.

Open the SurfacePolish enquiry form

#+86-592-2381506

Email : info@surface-polish.com

Headquarters address : No. 31, Xinchang Road, Xinyang Industrial Zone, Haicang District, Xiamen

click here to leave a message

Leave A Message
If you are interested in our products and want to know more details,please leave a message here,we will reply you as soon as we can.

Preparing secure enquiry form…

Home

Products

whatsapp

contact