Walther Trowal TT 60-B vs TT 140-B centrifugal disk catalog comparison
Review TT 60-B and TT 140-B from the official TT brochure marked 11/16, physical PDF page2. Compare 5 source fields, keep volume and equipment-rating bases distinct, and record your part, loading, site and acceptance questions. The downloadable review uses the current form inputs. Current website captures and source differences remain visible for supplier confirmation.
Compare the catalog and record your review
Versioned catalog rows
| Source field | TT 60-B | TT 140-B |
|---|---|---|
| Work bowl gross volume (L) | 60 | 140 |
| Work piece batch sizes (L; conditional footnote) | 6-40 | 14-100 |
| Installed power (kW; not measured consumption) | 4 | 11 |
| Speed at 50 Hz (RPM; equipment basis) | 213 | 178 |
| Bowl tilting system (PDF narrative, not installed approval) | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
Separate volume from an approved part load
The 11/16 brochure lists gross bowl volumes of 60 L for TT 60-B and 140 L for TT 140-B. Its work-piece batch entries are 6-40 L and 14-100 L, subject to workpiece geometry, material and nicking risk. Gross bowl volume is a different basis from the conditional batch row. Neither establishes an approved loading recipe, cycle time or throughput.
Review the equipment ratings
Drive power entries are 4 kW for TT 60-B and 11 kW for TT 140-B. Speed entries are 213 RPM and 178 RPM. The TT speed row is explicitly at50Hz. These are source equipment ratings, not process settings or measured consumption. No power total, electricity cost, drying time or finishing result is derived.
Record geometry and handling questions
The brochure describes TT 60-B tilting by hydraulic and TT 140-B by hydraulic. These descriptions distinguish the source configurations, but do not confirm installed loaders, screens, media-return systems or automation. Check your handling constraints and actual supplier drawing before comparing installation requirements. Lettered dimensions and narrative performance claims are excluded.
Keep current-web differences visible
No numeric difference was found in the selected current-web rows for this pair. This limited check does not establish agreement of all specifications or installed options. PDF TT25 work-piece batch entry16 L differs in label and value from current-web net volume3-18 L; no substitution or inferred occupancy. Batch footnote depends on workpiece geometry, material and nicking risk; ranges are not guaranteed loads or throughput. PDF shared bowl-material row and current-web material cells differ in layout and wording; no per-model material approval is adopted. Electric gear motor versus hydraulic tilting is a versioned narrative; installed peripherals and automation need actual supplier specification. Lettered dimensions are excluded; no floor-plan or site-fit inference.
Official current TT product pageSource and sample-review scope
Official TT brochure, 11/16, physical page2, captured2026-10-05.
This is an independent versioned Walther Trowal reference. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, equivalent machinery, current offers or trial outcomes. Use the comparison to prepare questions and preserve the source basis. Any text you enter is USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED.
Questions about this model pair
How do TT 60-B and TT 140-B compare in volume?
The 11/16 brochure lists gross bowl volumes of 60 L for TT 60-B and 140 L for TT 140-B. Its work-piece batch entries are 6-40 L and 14-100 L, subject to workpiece geometry, material and nicking risk. Gross bowl volume is a different basis from the conditional batch row. Neither establishes an approved loading recipe, cycle time or throughput.
What geometry or handling constraints need review?
The brochure describes TT 60-B tilting by hydraulic and TT 140-B by hydraulic. These descriptions distinguish the source configurations, but do not confirm installed loaders, screens, media-return systems or automation. Check your handling constraints and actual supplier drawing before comparing installation requirements. Lettered dimensions and narrative performance claims are excluded.
Can the power and speed entries predict operating cost or results?
Drive power entries are 4 kW for TT 60-B and 11 kW for TT 140-B. Speed entries are 213 RPM and 178 RPM. The TT speed row is explicitly at50Hz. These are source equipment ratings, not process settings or measured consumption. No power total, electricity cost, drying time or finishing result is derived.
Does the current website use the same source basis?
No numeric difference was found in the selected current-web rows for this pair. This limited check does not establish agreement of all specifications or installed options. PDF TT25 work-piece batch entry16 L differs in label and value from current-web net volume3-18 L; no substitution or inferred occupancy. Batch footnote depends on workpiece geometry, material and nicking risk; ranges are not guaranteed loads or throughput. PDF shared bowl-material row and current-web material cells differ in layout and wording; no per-model material approval is adopted. Electric gear motor versus hydraulic tilting is a versioned narrative; installed peripherals and automation need actual supplier specification. Lettered dimensions are excluded; no floor-plan or site-fit inference.
How should I use this comparison in a sample enquiry?
This is an independent versioned Walther Trowal reference. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, equivalent machinery, current offers or trial outcomes. Use the comparison to prepare questions and preserve the source basis. Any text you enter is USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED.
Related review tools
Prepare a sample review enquiry
Provide your part drawing, finishing objective, medium and separation restrictions, installation constraints and acceptance method for a SurfacePolish discussion.
Open the SurfacePolish enquiry form
+86-592-2381506 
IPv6 network supported 