Walther Trowal TT 90-A/2C vs TT 280-A/2C two-batch centrifugal disk catalog comparison
Review TT 90-A/2C and TT 280-A/2C from the official TT-A brochure marked 03/16, physical PDF page2. Compare 5 source fields and preserve their units and conditional bases. Record your part or water-stream objective, loading or contaminant questions, site requirements and acceptance method. The download uses your current form inputs. Current-web captures and differences remain separate for supplier confirmation.
Compare source rows and record your review
Versioned catalog rows
| Source field | TT 90-A/2C | TT 280-A/2C |
|---|---|---|
| Gross work bowl volume (L) | 90 | 280 |
| Conditional workpiece batch capacity (L) | 8–60 | 28–200 |
| Spinning power (kW; equipment rating) | 4 | 15 |
| Speed at 50 Hz (RPM) | 213 | 181 |
| Screen area (m²) | 0.5 | 0.8 |
Capacity entries for this pair
Gross work bowl volume (L): TT 90-A/2C 90; TT 280-A/2C 280. Conditional workpiece batch capacity (L): TT 90-A/2C 8–60; TT 280-A/2C 28–200. The parameter columns explicitly name A/2C. A/T dimensional columns and tandem narrative do not authorize copying these ratings into A/T model records. Conditional loading depends on part geometry, material and nicking risk. Two-batch architecture is not measured throughput or a guaranteed cycle-time saving. Lettered drawing dimensions and shared material/drive rows are excluded.
Drive entries for this pair
Spinning power (kW; equipment rating): TT 90-A/2C 4; TT 280-A/2C 15. Speed at 50 Hz (RPM): TT 90-A/2C 213; TT 280-A/2C 181. The parameter columns explicitly name A/2C. A/T dimensional columns and tandem narrative do not authorize copying these ratings into A/T model records. Conditional loading depends on part geometry, material and nicking risk. Two-batch architecture is not measured throughput or a guaranteed cycle-time saving. Lettered drawing dimensions and shared material/drive rows are excluded.
Geometry entries for this pair
Screen area (m²): TT 90-A/2C 0.5; TT 280-A/2C 0.8. The parameter columns explicitly name A/2C. A/T dimensional columns and tandem narrative do not authorize copying these ratings into A/T model records. Conditional loading depends on part geometry, material and nicking risk. Two-batch architecture is not measured throughput or a guaranteed cycle-time saving. Lettered drawing dimensions and shared material/drive rows are excluded.
Keep current-web differences visible
No numeric difference was found in the selected web rows for this pair. This limited check does not establish agreement of all specifications. Model labels and row labels retain their respective captured versions. Confirm an actual supplier specification before using a current system configuration.
Official current TT-A product page
Source and sample-review scope
Official TT-A brochure, 03/16, physical page2, captured2026-10-05.
This independent Walther Trowal reference helps prepare a source-bound equipment discussion. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, equivalent machinery, current offers or customer trials. The tool reports printed values without machine ranking or numerical scoring. Your annotations remain USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED. Bring a real part or process-water sample, loading or contaminant constraints, site supply details and an acceptance method to the supplier review.
Questions about this model pair
What source distinguishes TT 90-A/2C from TT 280-A/2C?
Gross work bowl volume (L): TT 90-A/2C 90; TT 280-A/2C 280. Conditional workpiece batch capacity (L): TT 90-A/2C 8–60; TT 280-A/2C 28–200. The parameter columns explicitly name A/2C. A/T dimensional columns and tandem narrative do not authorize copying these ratings into A/T model records. Conditional loading depends on part geometry, material and nicking risk. Two-batch architecture is not measured throughput or a guaranteed cycle-time saving. Lettered drawing dimensions and shared material/drive rows are excluded.
Can these values predict a load, treatment result or cost?
Use the exact versioned source and row basis; current website values stay separate. Media quantities, volumes and conditional capacity ranges are not approved loads or throughput. Catalog power, speed and processing time are not metered consumption, costs or trial recipes. Dimensions and tank capacities do not establish site fit, installed options or treatment quality. Independent Walther Trowal reference; Jintaijin supply, partnership, equivalence and current offer are not established. User annotations are not verified trials or customer facts.
Which source differences need supplier confirmation?
No numeric difference was found in the selected web rows for this pair. This limited check does not establish agreement of all specifications. Model labels and row labels retain their respective captured versions. Confirm an actual supplier specification before using a current system configuration.
What must a sample review establish?
This independent Walther Trowal reference helps prepare a source-bound equipment discussion. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, equivalent machinery, current offers or customer trials. The tool reports printed values without machine ranking or numerical scoring. Your annotations remain USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED. Bring a real part or process-water sample, loading or contaminant constraints, site supply details and an acceptance method to the supplier review.
Does this page confirm a currently offered Jintaijin equivalent?
No. The source is a versioned third-party catalog. No current Jintaijin equivalent, offered configuration or partnership is established.
Related review tools
Prepare a sample review enquiry
Provide a drawing or process-water description, objective, constraints and acceptance method for a SurfacePolish discussion.
Open the SurfacePolish enquiry form
+86-592-2381506 
IPv6 network supported 