Walther Trowal ZM 03-ECO 1 vs ZM 03-FL basket centrifuge catalog comparison

Review ZM 03-ECO 1 and ZM 03-FL from the official ZM brochure marked 06/14, physical PDF page2. Compare 7 source fields and preserve their units and conditional bases. Record your part or water-stream objective, loading or contaminant questions, site requirements and acceptance method. The download uses your current form inputs. Current-web captures and differences remain separate for supplier confirmation.

Walther Trowal ZM 03-ECO 1 vs ZM 03-FL basket centrifuge catalog comparison - capacity-basis-chart - Jintaijin
Original source-data chart or concept workflow. Versioned 06/14 PDF p2; no actual trial result.

Compare source rows and record your review

Choose a group and record questions for your supplier and sample owner.

Versioned catalog rows

Source fieldZM 03-ECO 1ZM 03-FL
Capacity (L/h; source rating)1,0001,000
Sludge basket capacity (L)1414
Centrifugal rating (g; gravity multiple)2,0122,012
Dirty water tank (L)200300
Process water tank (L; dash retained)-150
Dimensions L x B x H (mm; printed version)1,400 x 800 x 1,6001,400 x 1,200 x 1,600
Average power consumption (kW; catalog entry)1.51.5

Capacity entries for this pair

Capacity (L/h; source rating): ZM 03-ECO 1 1,000; ZM 03-FL 1,000. Sludge basket capacity (L): ZM 03-ECO 1 14; ZM 03-FL 14. Dirty water tank (L): ZM 03-ECO 1 200; ZM 03-FL 300. Process water tank (L; dash retained): ZM 03-ECO 1 -; ZM 03-FL 150. PDF ECO model is ZM03-ECO1; the current table labels ECO without1. Model labels and height1600 versus1750mm remain versioned and separate. A process-tank dash is unspecified/absent in the printed table; it is not numeric zero or proof of an installed tank arrangement. PDF narrative describes automatic PLC operation with manual basket emptying, whereas current wording is semi-automatic. No combined control specification or number of connected vibrators is approved. Average power, flow and basket volume do not establish metered energy, sludge weight, treatment efficacy or discharge compliance. Current-web specific-weight label is retained separately from PDF centrifugal-rating label; equal numeric cells are not proof of equal semantic basis.

Drive entries for this pair

Centrifugal rating (g; gravity multiple): ZM 03-ECO 1 2,012; ZM 03-FL 2,012. Average power consumption (kW; catalog entry): ZM 03-ECO 1 1.5; ZM 03-FL 1.5. PDF ECO model is ZM03-ECO1; the current table labels ECO without1. Model labels and height1600 versus1750mm remain versioned and separate. A process-tank dash is unspecified/absent in the printed table; it is not numeric zero or proof of an installed tank arrangement. PDF narrative describes automatic PLC operation with manual basket emptying, whereas current wording is semi-automatic. No combined control specification or number of connected vibrators is approved. Average power, flow and basket volume do not establish metered energy, sludge weight, treatment efficacy or discharge compliance. Current-web specific-weight label is retained separately from PDF centrifugal-rating label; equal numeric cells are not proof of equal semantic basis.

Geometry entries for this pair

Dimensions L x B x H (mm; printed version): ZM 03-ECO 1 1,400 x 800 x 1,600; ZM 03-FL 1,400 x 1,200 x 1,600. PDF ECO model is ZM03-ECO1; the current table labels ECO without1. Model labels and height1600 versus1750mm remain versioned and separate. A process-tank dash is unspecified/absent in the printed table; it is not numeric zero or proof of an installed tank arrangement. PDF narrative describes automatic PLC operation with manual basket emptying, whereas current wording is semi-automatic. No combined control specification or number of connected vibrators is approved. Average power, flow and basket volume do not establish metered energy, sludge weight, treatment efficacy or discharge compliance. Current-web specific-weight label is retained separately from PDF centrifugal-rating label; equal numeric cells are not proof of equal semantic basis.

Walther Trowal ZM 03-ECO 1 vs ZM 03-FL basket centrifuge catalog comparison - power-basis-chart - Jintaijin
Original source-data chart or concept workflow. Versioned 06/14 PDF p2; no actual trial result.

Keep current-web differences visible

ZM 03-ECO 1 dimension: PDF 1,400 x 800 x 1,600; current-web Dimensions (mm) (LxWxH) 1,400x800x1,750. ZM 03-FL dimension: PDF 1,400 x 1,200 x 1,600; current-web Dimensions (mm) (LxWxH) 1,400x1,200x1,750. Model labels and row labels retain their respective captured versions. Confirm an actual supplier specification before using a current system configuration.

Official current ZM product page
Walther Trowal ZM 03-ECO 1 vs ZM 03-FL basket centrifuge catalog comparison - source-review-flow-diagram - Jintaijin
Original source-data chart or concept workflow. Versioned 06/14 PDF p2; no actual trial result.

Source and sample-review scope

Official ZM brochure, 06/14, physical page2, captured2026-10-05.

This independent Walther Trowal reference helps prepare a source-bound equipment discussion. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, equivalent machinery, current offers or customer trials. The tool reports printed values without machine ranking or numerical scoring. Your annotations remain USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED. Bring a real part or process-water sample, loading or contaminant constraints, site supply details and an acceptance method to the supplier review.

Questions about this model pair

What source distinguishes ZM 03-ECO 1 from ZM 03-FL?

Capacity (L/h; source rating): ZM 03-ECO 1 1,000; ZM 03-FL 1,000. Sludge basket capacity (L): ZM 03-ECO 1 14; ZM 03-FL 14. Dirty water tank (L): ZM 03-ECO 1 200; ZM 03-FL 300. Process water tank (L; dash retained): ZM 03-ECO 1 -; ZM 03-FL 150. PDF ECO model is ZM03-ECO1; the current table labels ECO without1. Model labels and height1600 versus1750mm remain versioned and separate. A process-tank dash is unspecified/absent in the printed table; it is not numeric zero or proof of an installed tank arrangement. PDF narrative describes automatic PLC operation with manual basket emptying, whereas current wording is semi-automatic. No combined control specification or number of connected vibrators is approved. Average power, flow and basket volume do not establish metered energy, sludge weight, treatment efficacy or discharge compliance. Current-web specific-weight label is retained separately from PDF centrifugal-rating label; equal numeric cells are not proof of equal semantic basis.

Can these values predict a load, treatment result or cost?

Use the exact versioned source and row basis; current website values stay separate. Media quantities, volumes and conditional capacity ranges are not approved loads or throughput. Catalog power, speed and processing time are not metered consumption, costs or trial recipes. Dimensions and tank capacities do not establish site fit, installed options or treatment quality. Independent Walther Trowal reference; Jintaijin supply, partnership, equivalence and current offer are not established. User annotations are not verified trials or customer facts.

Which source differences need supplier confirmation?

ZM 03-ECO 1 dimension: PDF 1,400 x 800 x 1,600; current-web Dimensions (mm) (LxWxH) 1,400x800x1,750. ZM 03-FL dimension: PDF 1,400 x 1,200 x 1,600; current-web Dimensions (mm) (LxWxH) 1,400x1,200x1,750. Model labels and row labels retain their respective captured versions. Confirm an actual supplier specification before using a current system configuration.

What must a sample review establish?

This independent Walther Trowal reference helps prepare a source-bound equipment discussion. It does not establish Jintaijin supply, partnership, equivalent machinery, current offers or customer trials. The tool reports printed values without machine ranking or numerical scoring. Your annotations remain USER_RECORDED_NOT_VERIFIED. Bring a real part or process-water sample, loading or contaminant constraints, site supply details and an acceptance method to the supplier review.

Does this page confirm a currently offered Jintaijin equivalent?

No. The source is a versioned third-party catalog. No current Jintaijin equivalent, offered configuration or partnership is established.

Related review tools

Prepare a sample review enquiry

Provide a drawing or process-water description, objective, constraints and acceptance method for a SurfacePolish discussion.

Open the SurfacePolish enquiry form

#+86-592-2381506

Email : info@surface-polish.com

Headquarters address : No. 31, Xinchang Road, Xinyang Industrial Zone, Haicang District, Xiamen

click here to leave a message

Leave A Message
If you are interested in our products and want to know more details,please leave a message here,we will reply you as soon as we can.

Preparing secure enquiry form…

Home

Products

whatsapp

contact