Jintaijin | Additive manufacturing part review
SLA and DLP resin cure and edge condition review planner
Build a SLA / DLP incoming-part review brief: record material, local surface conditions, protected features and preparation records. Export unanswered questions.
Keep washing, curing and support-removal references separate: one completed step does not prove the others. Record the fine edges that must remain intact and the agreed inspection for local gloss differences. Unknown instructions remain questions in the export.
Build your SLA / DLP condition review brief
Enter observations and document references, not personal contact details. Unknown states remain questions. Each text field accepts at most 240 visible characters.
Separate the incoming conditions
A support nub and a patch of different gloss need separate references. Record edge condition before a trial and identify the resin instruction revision. Visual appearance cannot establish cure state, strength or application suitability.
- Support nub location: record the actual feature and observation.
- Fine edge / thin detail: record the actual feature and observation.
- Gloss-to-matte patch: record the actual feature and observation.
Define what must be preserved
Identify the drawing revision, protected feature and inspection owner. Visual and dimensional changes are separate observations. If no local limit or inspection method has been agreed, leave the question open instead of interpreting a cosmetic goal as an acceptance requirement.
Source context and preparation records
Formlabs describes resin washing and material-dependent post-curing. Confirm the instructions for the actual resin; its examples do not define a universal DLP workflow. Read the manufacturer reference.
The Jintaijin additive manufacturing article lists these incoming-condition examples, checked 4 October 2026. Only observation categories are used. Its media, sequence and outcome columns are not accepted as a validated recipe.
This tool does not establish supplier capability for your material or replace applicable material instructions. Request a representative technical review with actual part records before agreeing trial conditions.
SLA / DLP review questions
Does every SLA or DLP resin need the same cure schedule?
No. Use instructions for the actual resin, printer and application. This planner records their reference and status without supplying a schedule.
Does this planner recommend a finishing recipe?
No. It records incoming conditions and inspection requirements. No validated time, media, concentration or stock-removal recipe is supplied.
What happens to unknown instruction status?
It stays in the unanswered list. Documented or not applicable requires a reference or reason. The export preserves inputs without converting them into approval.
Does the export send an inquiry automatically?
No. JSON downloads locally. Review before sharing with a technical contact. No contact details or submission are required by this tool.
Related inspection tools
- Mass finishing part acceptance record builder
- Deburring same feature dimensional change calculator
- Small feature media entry exit edge checklist
- Mass finishing interval inspection record builder
Request a SLA / DLP part review after reviewing the downloaded brief.
+86-592-2381506 
IPv6 network supported 