Jintaijin | Large vibratory tub series
L1300 vs L1800 vibratory tub finisher comparison
Compare L1300 vs L1800: published nominal liters, internal chamber, outer dimensions, net weight and dual-motor rating. Export a source-backed comparison.
Review the exact published differences between L1300 and L1800 before asking for a supplied configuration and representative-part trial. Compare nominal liters, internal chamber, outer envelope, dual-motor notation and net weight separately. You can change the two model selections, enter an optional nominal-liter reference for arithmetic, and export the current source records and differences. No usable loading, cycle time or accepted output is inferred.
Compare two published tub records
Leave the optional reference blank or enter a positive value with up to two decimals. 1000000 L is a software ceiling. Margins only compare nominal catalogue liters; they do not specify the amount of media or parts to load.
L1300 vs L1800: source fields side by side
| Published field | L1300 | L1800 |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal bowl capacity (L) | 1200.0 | 1800.0 |
| Internal chamber L × W × H (mm) | 1200 × 1000 × 1000 | 1800 × 1400 × 1000 |
| Outer L × W × H (mm) | 2700 × 1300 × 1400 | 2800 × 1700 × 2000 |
| Dual-motor rating reference | 5.0 kW × 2 | 7.5 kW × 2 |
| Net equipment weight (kg) | 2200.0 | 3000.0 |
| Liner thickness reference | 20-35 mm / 0.8"-1.4" | 20-35 mm / 0.8"-1.4" |
| Control panel reference | Standard | Standard |
| Chamber divider reference | Optional Accessory | Optional Accessory |
Checked 3 October 2026 against the primary large-tub technical table. Model L1300's capacity cell is 1200 L, so model suffixes are not used as liter values. Metric values are taken under their explicit headings; optional chamber dividers are not assumed supplied.
Nominal liters and chamber differences
L1300 lists 1200 L and an internal chamber of 1200 × 1000 × 1000 mm. L1800 lists 1800 L and 1800 × 1400 × 1000 mm. The signed nominal-capacity difference is 600 L. These are catalogue references, not a fill prescription, permitted part envelope or accepted batch output.
Ask how representative parts move, separate and contact each other in the current supplied chamber. Nominal volume cannot establish material compatibility, part count, liner life or a validated finishing cycle.
Outside envelope and handling
The outer dimensions are 2700 × 1300 × 1400 mm and 2800 × 1700 × 2000 mm. Length times width gives 3.5100 m² and 4.7600 m²; the signed footprint difference is 1.2500 m². Keep the outside envelope separate from internal chamber dimensions. Access and current supplied configuration need a drawing review.
Net equipment weight changes from 2200 kg to 3000 kg, a signed difference of 800 kg. Request packed gross weight and handling instructions separately; this table does not approve lifting or floor capacity.
Preserve the dual-motor notation
The table states 5.0 kW × 2 for L1300 and 7.5 kW × 2 for L1800. Per-motor rating differs by 2.5 kW; both configurations explicitly list two motors. Neither the individual ratings nor their arithmetic sum measures operating electricity or determines supply design.
Both records publish 20-35 mm / 0.8"-1.4" liner thickness, a Standard control reference and an Optional Accessory divider reference. These common catalogue labels do not prove the delivered specification, maintenance interval or safety configuration.
Questions about L1300 vs L1800
How do nominal capacity and chamber dimensions differ for L1300 vs L1800?
L1300 lists 1200 L and an internal chamber of 1200 × 1000 × 1000 mm. L1800 lists 1800 L and 1800 × 1400 × 1000 mm. The signed nominal-capacity difference is 600 L. These are catalogue references, not a fill prescription, permitted part envelope or accepted batch output.
How does the outside footprint differ for L1300 vs L1800?
The outer dimensions are 2700 × 1300 × 1400 mm and 2800 × 1700 × 2000 mm. Length times width gives 3.5100 m² and 4.7600 m²; the signed footprint difference is 1.2500 m². Keep the outside envelope separate from internal chamber dimensions. Access and current supplied configuration need a drawing review.
What does the dual-motor notation mean in the L1300 vs L1800 source?
The table states 5.0 kW × 2 for L1300 and 7.5 kW × 2 for L1800. Per-motor rating differs by 2.5 kW; both configurations explicitly list two motors. Neither the individual ratings nor their arithmetic sum measures operating electricity or determines supply design.
Can the net weight difference approve shipment or lifting for L1300 vs L1800?
Net equipment weight changes from 2200 kg to 3000 kg, a signed difference of 800 kg. Request packed gross weight and handling instructions separately; this table does not approve lifting or floor capacity.
Related references and inquiry
Browse the three large-tub records. Review dual-motor rating arithmetic. Compare outside floor footprints.
Request a L1300 vs L1800 configuration review with your drawing, part geometry, trial target and current comparison export.
